Port Politics
The development of Kalibaru new
terminals at the Port of Tanjung Priok, Jakarta, has been officially
inaugurated by President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono recently. Though the initial civil works
have been conducted before the ceremony held, it is however still an important
aspect, perhaps the ultimate one, for the project's progress. Ground breaking
ceremony by the government chief executive officer in the port development provides
a political leverage.
With it the developer maybe
able to generate financial back up that is urgently required in accomplishing
the construction. For the Indonesia Port Corp II (now popularly abbreviated
IPC) fund is a problem right now. The company is actually
profitable but the revenue it bags must be transferred to the State as
dividend, leaving only small portion of it for business expansion. News reports
said the company had secured from Mandiri Bank, around Rp 11 trillions, to
finance Kalibaru project. But, that money is still not yet in the firm’s
pocket.
The presidential attendance
in ground breaking ceremony is not new
for IPC. Previously, three
presidents, namely the late President Soeharto, the late President Abdurrahman
Wahid and President Megawati Soekarnoputri, had inaugurated the development of
Bojonegara port in Banten province.
Unfortunately, it had been dropped. Even, several
personnel of IPC in charge of the project had been summoned and questioned by
the Attorney General Office with
corruption charges. It's interesting that nobody went to the court for this
case. We do not expect the development of Kalibaru terminals to end up on such
a tragic way.
Political leverage
is gained through applicating political maneuver. At
certain level, IPC has successfully implimented
it in Kalibaru project. The first maneuver was that of the disposal of Kalibaru
open bidding. It is certainly not the policy of the company, instead, that was
the Ministry of Transportation’s decision. But, it’s believed that IPC was the
party behind it.
The maneuver was
sealed up by a presidential order, No. 36/2012, appointing the company as the
developer of Kalibaru terminals and disqualified all participants of the tender.
We must be sorry for this. At the moment, some of them, for instance Maersk and
Hutchison, are contesting for right to operate the remaining terminals, 2 and
3. The operator for terminal 1 is already named, that is Mitsui & Co Ltd.
This time the host of the bidding process is IPC.
As such the state-owned
enterprise transforms to a regulatory body, something contradics with the
Shipping Act No. 17/2008. According to the law, the regulatory function is
reserved in the hand of the government via the Port Authority (PA) while IPC,
as well as its fellows Pelindo I, Pelindo III and Pelindo IV, is only the
operator. As the operator all state port companies actually share equal chance
with private firms in the business field. However, the later says, all Pelindo
are becoming more monopolistic now.
In developing the
Port of Tanjung Pelepas (PTP) former Malaysian Prime Minister Dr. Mahathir
Mohamad, at some extent, also played political maneuver. The port is located in
the northern part of the country where no cargo can be handled since all
industrial estates reside around the southern port of Klang. But, Dr. M
insisted and keep developing PTP and made it as one of the excellent hub port
in Asia.
Port politics is
also executed by the Ministry of Transportation in its effort to develop
Cilamaya port in Karawang, West Java. Instead of tendering the project, the
office manages it alone. News reports said it is seeking US$50 million to
finance Cilamaya. The presence of the port is projected to be
shifting the concentration of logistics and transport of export-import goods by
40 percent of the total volume of goods from the Port of Tanjung Priok.
So, it’s nothing wrong with the politics in the port; it’s a normality in business. The problem is
only about the position. Pelindo has been plotted by the government as the
operator so its room for maneuver already limited. If it still tried to play
it, it definitely breached the law. We cannot call everything done by Pelindo
in its business activity as a breakthrough anymore. Rule is rule. That’s
simple.*****
Komentar
Posting Komentar